Ventana Wildlife Society just posted two photos on Facebook of the first wild-raised condor chick to enter the flock in over 100 years at Pinnacles National Park! This seemed like great news to send us into the weekend.
This image nicely complements our post on the colors of condors.
A few of the CondorWatch Scientists just published a new paper in the journal Environmental Science and Technology documenting that condors eating marine mammals carcasses along the Big Sur Coast of California are exposed to potentially harmful contaminants.
Because marine mammal carcasses can be an abundant food source for condors and are thought to have helped prevent their extinction at the end of the last ice age, people welcomed the inclusion of marine mammals on the condor’s menu. However, marine mammals, and California sea lions in particular, are known to contain high levels of toxic chemicals such as DDE, the main breakdown product of the agricultural pesticide DDT. Now you might be thinking “But DDT was banned for use in the United States decades ago?” Yes, that is true, but unfortunately DDE is very persistent and is still around today – especially in tissues of marine predators such as California sea lions.
DDE has been shown to cause eggshell thinning and reduced hatching success in birds and DDE exposure has been linked to population declines of multiple species, including the bald eagle, peregrine falcon, and brown pelican.
Our new study estimated that about 40 percent of breeding-age coastal condors have DDE levels at or above levels that caused eggshell thinning in bald eagles and about 20 percent meet or exceed levels associated with nest failure in bald eagles. A prior study led by one of our condor collaborators, Joe Burnett with the Ventana Wildlife Society, has documented that condors on the coast have thinner eggs and reduced hatching success compared to condors that breed inland.
So, what do we do? Well we do know that lead poisoning is the number one cause of condor mortality and our prior work has shown that if we eliminate or greatly reduce lead poisoning the condor population can recover. However, it is worrisome that condors ingest DDE along with a full cocktail of other contaminants when feeding on marine mammals, especially California sea lions. Our team is currently working to assess the effects of decreases in nesting success due to DDE on condor recovery.
Ultimately, our study highlights a harsh reality: we are all being exposed to multiple contaminants throughout our lives — even us humans! We should do what we can to minimize exposures we have the most control over (lead-free ammunition anyone?!) and also push to reduce our use of toxic chemicals as individuals and as a society.
In the end the condor is one tough bird and we are hopeful that even though DDE might be a hurdle that impacts some coastal birds, across California condor chicks will keep hatching and the numbers of condors soaring in the sky will continue to grow.
On April 28th and 29th some of the scientists involved with CondorWatch (Vickie Bakker, Dan Doak, Myra Finkelstein and Zeka Kuspa) held a workshop with condor biologists and managers to talk condor conservation. The workshop centered around how we can use models to predict the future population health of condors given different management scenarios. This approach is very useful for managers to understand how different threats and actions can influence a species’s future survival.
We had a productive workshop and one topic talked about A LOT was the importance of social structure to individual behavior. Indeed the field biologists again hypothesized that birds that hang out together may have similar lead exposure risks, and thus understanding social structure could help prioritize at-risk birds for enhanced monitoring. We think the knowledge of how social behavior influences a condor’s risk of lead poisoning (among other things) gained through the CondorWatch project will be critical to helping ensure that condors keep flying over our skies in the future!
So, thank you for your help with CondorWatch!
The Science Team
So, for all you CondorWatchers out there I thought it would be fun for you to see a series of feeding station photos that illustrate just how quickly a group of condors can pick clean a carcass. Scroll through this series and see that after ~2 hours all that was left of the carcass was the bone that was staked to the ground!
As Wreness would say “you win a Fish!” if you have classified any of the photos shown here in the series on CondorWatch.
Thanks to everyone on CondorWatch for helping us classify photos – we couldn’t do this without you!
Or, how likely is a condor to survive from one year to the next, given the different things a condor does or does not do. Understanding the things associated (or possibly affecting) a condor’s survival is key to managing them to optimize their chances of survival year after year.
Condors start breeding around 5 years of age (give or take – everyone is an individual!) so in order to replace itself, each generation a condor pair has to survive at least until they successful raise two chicks (or really a bit more than two to account for mortality). Then, condors are believed to be able to live up to 70 years! (or more – who knows??) The current flock is made up of young individuals, with the oldest just barely approaching middle age (e.g., Orange 21, the southern flock patriarch, is ~36, while the senior birds in the central flock are only ~20). Eventually carcass gatherings should include long-lived individuals that win the survival lottery — bird equivalents of your great-grandma at the family reunion, passing on stories of where the best dead things are found, how to avoid those pesky ravens and so on.
Vickie Bakker (the lead author) and I as well as other members of our science team just published a paper on condor survival “Effects of lead exposure, flock behavior, and management actions on the survival of California condors (Gymnogyps californianus)” in the journal EcoHealth that is available via online first at http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10393-015-1096-2
For those interested, here is the abstract that summarizes the paper:
“Translocation is an increasingly important tool for managing endangered species, but factors influencing the survival of translocated individuals are not well understood. Here we examine intrinsic and extrinsic drivers of survival for critically endangered California condors (Gymnogyps californianus) whose wild population recovery is reliant upon releases of captively bred stock. We used known fate models and information-theoretic methods to compare the ability of hypothesized covariates, most of which serve as proxies for lead exposure risk, to predict survival rates of condors in California. Our best supported model included the following predictors of survival: age of the recovery program, precipitation, proportion of days observed feeding on proffered carcasses, maximum blood lead concentration over the preceding 18 months, and time since release. We found that as flocks have increased in size and age, condors are increasingly likely to range more widely and less likely to be observed feeding on proffered food, and these “wilder” behaviors were associated with lower survival. After accounting for these behaviors, we found a positive survival trend, which we attribute to ongoing improvements in management. Our findings illustrate that the survival of translocated animals, such as highly social California condors, is influenced by behaviors that change through time.”
The main thing we found is that although managers are making progress in decreasing mortality risks for condors, the behaviors affecting survival most – such as feeding at the feeding stations where CW photos are taken – are also changing through time, and these changing behaviors tend to increase mortality risk for condors. So, like most things in life, “it is complicated”. As the flock has grown in size the birds are doing different things and this underscores the importance of CW to help us understand how a bird’s behavior at the free-food buffet (aka proffered feeding sites) is changing over time and affecting their survival and lead poisoning risk. So, thank you to all you do on CW!
And of course, we can’t have a blog post without a photo of a condor – this is one of my favorites – taken by Gavin Emmons
FYI – this paper will be part of a Supplementary Issue in EcoHealth on Health and Disease in Translocated Wild Animals that is a result of a symposium that I attended in the spring of 2015. For more information on symposium see http://www.zsl.org/science/whats-on/health-and-disease-in-translocated-wild-animals.
Yes, condors, like other animals such as albatross, have been known to eat trash. In fact, trash ingestion was found to be the leading cause of death for wild condor nestlings in a study published in 2012 (Rideout et al., Journal of Wildlife Diseases). Why condors ingest trash is unknown, but condor biologists think nestlings are exposed to trash items that have been brought back to the nesting area intentionally by their parents. (If you are interested to learn more about this topic, look up this paper “Why do condors and vultures eat junk: The implications for conservation” by Houston D, Mee A, McGrady M. published in the Journal of Raptor Research volume 41, pages 235-238 2007.)
We have seen condor nestlings ingest items such as coins, bottle caps and even a light bulb filament!
In addition to digestive impaction, trash ingestion may have toxicological effects on condors. Zinc toxicosis associated with trash ingestion was determined to be the cause of death for one condor nestling, and in two other cases nestlings that died of trash ingestion had elevated liver copper concentrations.
Condors are routinely lead poisoned by ingesting lead fragments in carcasses shot with lead-based ammunition, but it has been less clear whether trash ingestion represented another source of lead poisoning. To address this question, some of our science team members and condor collaborators recently published a paper entitled: “Lead Exposure Risk from Trash Ingestion by the Endangered California Condor (Gymnogyps californianus)” in the Journal of Wildlife Diseases. Because ingested or potentially ingested trash accumulates in nest areas, we sampled items found in the vicinity of nests or removed from nestlings.
We found that the majority of lead-containing trash items were ammunition-related. Out of 1,413 trash items collected from condor nest areas and nestlings in the Transverse Range of Ventura County, California USA, between 2002–2008, 27 items were found to have lead concentrations of potential toxicological concern. Twenty-two of these 27 items were clearly ammunition-related (shotgun shell, casing, etc., see photos below) and only three of these items were clearly not ammunition-related (two items un-classifiable). Our results suggested that trash ingestion of non-ammunition items does not pose a significant lead exposure risk to the California condor population in California, but ingestion of ammunition-related trash could be of concern and efforts to minimize a condor’s exposure to ammunition-related trash are warranted.
Here are some representative photos of the lead containing items we found either in condor nest areas or nestlings (from the Supplement section of our published paper):
Metal items were categorized as ammunition-related if they were clearly identifiable as such with corroboration by a California Department of Fish and Wildlife Lieutenant and a retired Assistant Chief with a combined 48 years of experience in law enforcement (J. Nores, C. Babich). Items with a leachate lead concentration >1 µg/mL were classified as containing sufficient lead to be of potential toxicological concern and referred to as ‘lead-containing’.
And just because we can’t have a blog post without a condor photo, here is one of condor 107 (red7), proudly strutting his stuff in an area free of trash!
To all our fabulous CondorWatchers! Thanks to you we had a great week last week with close to 3,000 classifications! that is twice as many as the week before and almost 3x as many as the week before that!
So, in honor of your hard work, I am resurrecting the fabulous red7 photo that our talented Wreness did for our one year anniversary!
Lets try for another record week and, as Wreness would say “Keep on carrion”!
Condors are extremely social creatures which makes them so interesting to observe, as you Condor Watchers can relate! Conveniently for us in the field, condors are diurnal and most active during midday as winds and thermals create favorable conditions for extended soaring flights. In the early morning hours, condors can typically be observed leisurely preening and sunning from their roosts atop tall trees or cliffs. It is common to see condors roosting together, whether it is on the same branch, in the same tree, or in a neighboring tree. The old adage, “safety in numbers”, is certainly true when it comes to condors. At communal roost sites, you can often expect to see frenzied activity at sunset as the birds compete for the most favorable or highest roost. Usually, the older and more dominant condors win the most coveted perches and any condor forced to perch below them will wake up covered in excrement. Such is the life of a lowly juvenile! As the sun rises the next morning and weather heats up, condors will begin launching one after the other from their roost sites to forage, fly back to a known carcass, or travel back to a nesting territory.
This leisurely behavior and social hierarchy often extends to communal feeding sites as well. Younger condors are often forced to wait their turn at a carcass while older or more dominant birds get their fill. In this situation, juveniles can be observed laying down and socializing with each other by entwining necks, allo-preening, and wrestling. Some of us in southern California call this a condor huddle puddle :). Other times, condors will loaf around or preen on the ground after feeding as long as they don’t feel threatened. We often see this at baited trap sites, where the motion-activated cameras have been installed, because it is a common and familiar source of food. Socialization in the condor world is extremely important for individuals to practice and be fluent in “condor” language, body language or otherwise, so that they can operate and function in the community flock. Among other things, the motion-activated cameras provide us with snapshots of behavior and social interactions which help give us insight into the complex condor community.
Devon Pryor was formerly a Biological Science Technician with the US Fish Wildlife Service, working on the condor program. She continues to work with condors in her current position as Conservation and Research Associate at the Santa Barbara Zoo.
Last Thursday I spent a whole day in Big Sur collecting poop samples from California condors. Why on earth am I doing this dirty work? Let me explain…
Numerous studies have found that lead poisoning from ingestion of spent lead ammunition is the primary cause of death in free-flying California condors. But what is happening to the condors that survive repeated lead exposures? I want to understand the potential adverse health effects of lead which may be accumulating in these individuals, as well as the potential impacts of these effects on survival and reproduction in the wild. Specifically I am interested in how chronic lead exposure can alter the response to stressors in the environment. Corticosterone, one of the hormones released during the condor stress response, is responsible for freeing up energetic resources for surviving a stressor and then storing energy stores for future recovery from that stressful event. In humans and other mammals, lead has been shown to impact the same brain region as chronic stress, and lead exposure can cause lasting alterations to the release patterns of corticosterone. In lead-exposed individuals the stress hormone can either be chronically elevated when no stressor is present, or the magnitude of change in hormone concentrations in response to a stressor is elevated, resulting in more corticosterone being released. This abnormal corticosterone release pattern can lead to changes in behavior, and inappropriate allocation of energy stores, both of which could impact the survival and/or reproductive output of these endangered birds.
So why condor poop? To assess the effects of lead on the condor stress response, I’ve been collecting blood, fecal, and feather samples from birds with different histories of lead exposure. Each sample type represents a different time scale of stress hormone released in response to a handling event: blood corticosterone is a direct and instantaneous measure of hormones in circulation, fecal corticosterone metabolites show a delay in elevation due to the time it takes for hormones to be eliminated via the gut, and feathers represent a longer-term integration of corticosterone release over 4-5 days. By looking at stress hormone responses in all three sample types, I will get a better overall picture of how the stress response might be altered in condors that have been exposed to lead more than others. As my experimental stressor, I use the capture and handling events already taking place for blood lead monitoring of the central California flock.
In order to collect fecal samples in a clean and timely manner with minimal stress to the condor, I developed a sampling kennel (pictured above) with a removable tray. This has allowed me to get sequential samples from individual birds and then map out and condor’s stress response to a handling event over time. I will collect enough samples to statistically compare stress response magnitudes in relation to individual lead exposure histories.
The free-flying condor population provides a unique opportunity to study this sub-lethal effect of lead since so much is known about each individual due to an intensive monitoring program, of which CondorWatch is an integral part!
We want to give a huge THANK YOU to all the dedicated CondorWatchers who have helped us reach almost 340,000 classifications! We also would like to commemorate this time with a little recognition of the condors that we lost over the last year as well as some of the new birds that have come to join the free-flying California population.
A big THANK YOU to wreness (our moderator extraordinaire) for her help compiling these photos and information and of course all she does for CondorWatch!
We had five chicks that fledged from the wild in 2014, including the unknown “Mystery”, who became famous for showing up for lunch one day at the Ventana Wildlife Society. (http://www.ventanaws.org/)
And the best news yet – a record 16 pairs of condors have made nests in CA so far in 2015! So, lets hope we have a record number of wild-fledged chicks in 2015!
And now the sad part — free-flying condors we lost this year from California:
We see them so frequently in the photos – sometimes 6 years in their lives – and they get to be familiar faces. It is always heartbreaking to see in a condor’s Bio that it has died from lead poisoning but hits harder when you have seen this bird in hundreds of photos. We sincerely appreciate your to help compiling data that can add a new tool to the arsenal in treating these condors before it’s too late.
So, in Memory for these majestic birds (15 of them total) that we lost from the free-flying California population since CondorWatch launched:
*Orange63 (63 Male) 5/8/1991 – 9/28/2014 Age 23 cause of death: trauma – predation
*Red25 (125 Male) 6/2/1995 – 7/18/2014 Age 18 years cause of death: bobcat predation
Condor #125 hatched at the San Diego Safari Park in 1995 and was released the following year. He was an 18 year-old breeding male that had been paired with female condor #111 since 2003. He paired with #111 eleven times over twelve years, making them the longest lasting and most prolific pair of condors in the southern California flock. Despite many nest failures early on in their relationship, they successfully fledged four chicks. Three of their four offspring are currently flying in the SoCal population
*400 (Female) – wore tags: Black0 Underline, White0, White 00 4/11/2006 – 4/292014 8 years cause of death: lead poisoning
*401 (Male) wore tags: Black 01 Underline, White 1 4/13/2006 – 6/15/2014 8 years cause of death: lead poisoning
A true fighter, 401 was treated for lead poisoning at least five times including surviving being shot with lead bird shot. The last and fatal poisoning event ended his life. The whole story can be read on our blog here https://blog.condorwatch.org/2014/10/28/the-tragic-fate-of-condor-401/
*White11 (411 Male) 4/26/2006 – 12/6/14 cause of death: undetermined;, scavenged remains
*White44 (444 “Ventana”) 5/5/2007 – 8/26/2014 cause of death: lead poisoning
#444 was known as “Ventana” to the many condor spotters who searched the skies with their binoculars, She was hatched from an egg laid at the Los Angeles Zoo and was the first to be raised in the wild by condor foster parents.
Also lost in the last year: Eight condors aged 3 weeks to almost 3 years of age to factors such as predation, trauma, and a few pending cases.
So, we would like to take a moment to remember these birds but also to thank you for all your efforts gathering data to help California condors become a healthy free-flying population in California and beyond! We really do appreciate all you do so keep on carrion (as wreness would say)!
The Science Team